Saturday, 26 April 2008

Reggae Music

I have enjoyed listening to Reggae music for years, starting - as most people do - with Bob Marley and the Wailers, and then graduating to other forms of Roots Reggae. I then discovered the sonic joys of Dub Reggae, and I have continued to find new artists and styles within this genre.

Like other musical styles, Reggae can seem confusing to the newcomer. I warmly recommend Lloyd Bradley's book Bass Culture, as a guide to the history of the music and the people involved in it (Available at Amazon.co.uk and Amazon.com).

One aspect of Reggae that can seem confusing to those more at home with rock and pop music is the version. Many different versions of the same tune are released by different artists. Furthermore, many different tracks will use the same basic music (called a 'riddim') but have different vocals applied to them. For example Althea and Donna's hit "Uptown Top Ranking" uses the riddim from Marcia Aitken's version of Alton Ellis' "I'm Still In Love".



The ReggaeID web site is an excellent source of information on the genre, giving details of artists, their songs, and what riddims were used.

Reggae music has so many varieties that there is bound to be one that you will like, whether it be Lover's Rock or Toasting.

Saturday, 19 April 2008

Rick Rolling

Stop it now!
It is not big and it is not clever - and it is certainly not ironic.

Please note that this site is going through a redesign again. I am playing with transparency at the moment. Watch this space.

Sunday, 13 April 2008

Plagiarism

This is my first proper post (or should that be 'rant'?) on this blog since I decided to change its direction... and it is a doozy...

I have discovered the first case of what looks like plagiarism of one of my posts. Last week I wrote a post as part of my 'On this day in history' series on my Modern Historian blog about the launch of the fateful Apollo 13 mission to the Moon. While I was chain dropping entrecards I noticed a post on another blog that bore a striking resemblance to mine, but there was no link crediting me as the original writer. On closer inspection I noticed that the poster had made a few cosmetic changes to the text.

Here is the text of my post:
On April 11th 1970, A Saturn V rocket launched from the Kennedy Space Center in Florida carrying the crew of the Apollo 13, James A. Lovell, John L. Swigert and Fred W. Haise, on what was intended to be the third manned landing on the Moon.

Two days into the mission a faulty oxygen tank caused an explosion that damaged the spacecraft's oxygen supply and electrical systems. The astronauts and ground crew faced a race against time to find a solution to the life threatening situation and achieve a return to Earth.

By using the Lunar Module as a 'lifeboat', reducing energy consumption and making repairs to the oxygen supply system the spacecraft managed to splashdown safely on 17th April.

This is the text from the other blog:
April 11th 1970 — A Saturn V rocket launched from the Kennedy Space Center in Florida carrying James A. Lovell, John L. Swigert and Fred W. Haise, on what was meant to be the third manned landing on the Moon.

Two days into the mission a faulty oxygen tank caused an explosion that damaged the spacecraft’s oxygen supply and electrical systems. The astronauts and ground crew ran a race against time to find a solution to the life threatening situation.

By using the Lunar Excursion Module as a lifeboat and making repairs to the oxygen supply system, the crew managed to splashdown safely on April 17th.

The blogger has since changed their post so that it no longer resembles mine so much. This happened after I messaged them via entrecard (because I couldn't leave a comment on their post) to point out that it was customary to credit the original post with a link, otherwise it looks like plagiarism.

As it was, they decided to make a counter-accusation that I was the plagiarist in the amended post. They assert 'some sentences and sentence fragments in the complaining blogger’s post were lifted word for word from' the Case Western Reserve University astronomy site (their emphasis).

Of course, this is simply not the case. A quick read through my post and the information on the CWRU site will show the falsity of this claim. The fact is that I used the information on the NASA site that I mentioned within my post, and even then I composed original text and didn't copy and paste anything from it.

I had not seen the site that I am accused of plagiarising until today. Although, it is worth noting that if you search on the first paragraph of my post in Google then the site I am accused of plagiarising appears after my post at the top of the list.

It is also interesting to note that the blogger still hasn't included a link to my original post so that the readers of that site can judge the validity of the accusations for themselves. Admittedly, the blogger's failure to mention my blog means that the accusations are aimed at an anonymous party.

This whole episode has made me think about the business of authorship on the web. I have absolutely no problem with anyone quoting my sends verbatim, as long as I get some credit. There are many hard-working blog authors out there who share the fruits of their labour with the world, and there are many bloggers who simply regurgitate the work of others or just post the latest cool video they have found on YouTube.

So, I say a hats off to those bloggers who create original texts (you know who you are) and a salacious gesture to those that leech the work of others.

Friday, 4 April 2008

Change of direction for this blog

From now on this blog is going to be a personal, general blog. Pressures of work, study and my other blog have meant that I cannot dedicate the amount of time I would like to the subject of counter-culture. Nevertheless, I will continue sharing my knowledge and experience on the subject of history on my new blog The Modern Historian.

I have already imported some of the articles from this blog to that one (using an excellent tool called Blog2Blog available here) and I will be able to add content more often as I plunder my old undergraduate essays for articles and share the fruits of the academic research that I am conducting.

I will also feel to add new articles to this blog too, whether in the form of sharing my experiences of blogging in particular or rants about life in general. I will leave all existing content on this blog; although, the name and design will change (but not the address).

Thank you all for support for this blog.
K